Microsystems Engineers

Research, design, develop, or test microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices.

Most important skills

  1. Reading Comprehension
  2. Active Listening
  3. Critical Thinking
  4. Complex Problem Solving
  5. Writing
  6. Systems Analysis
  7. Speaking
  8. Science

Key knowledge

  1. Computers and Electronics
  2. Engineering and Technology
  3. Mathematics
  4. Physics
  5. Design
  6. English Language
  7. Production and Processing
  8. Mechanical

What the work involves

  • Consider environmental issues when proposing product designs involving microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology.
  • Design or develop energy products using nanomaterials or nanoprocesses, such as micro-nano machining.
  • Design or develop industrial air quality microsystems, such as carbon dioxide fixing devices.
  • Design or develop sensors to reduce the energy or resource requirements to operate appliances, such as washing machines or dishwashing machines.
  • Design sensors or switches that require little or no power to operate for environmental monitoring or industrial metering applications.
  • Research or develop emerging microelectromechanical (MEMS) systems to convert nontraditional energy sources into power, such as ambient energy harvesters that convert environmental vibrations into usable energy.
  • Plan or schedule engineering research or development projects involving microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology.
  • Communicate operating characteristics or performance experience to other engineers or designers for training or new product development purposes.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Investigative, Realistic, Conventional.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
Master's Degree (34.2% of respondents)
Related experience
Over 1 year, up to and including 2 years (38.6%)
On-the-job training
Over 6 months, up to and including 1 year (64%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 5: Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Microsystems Engineers is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
  • Projection education uses SOC 17-2199 (detailed_parent); it may describe a broader group.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersVery lowLower on contact with others than 81% of occupations compared—
Dealing with the publicModerateLower on dealing with the public than 55% of occupations compared56% of surveyed respondents chose “Very important”
TeamworkHighHigher on teamwork than 68% of occupations compared62% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
Freedom to make decisionsHighHigher on freedom to make decisions than 76% of occupations compared58% of surveyed respondents chose “A lot of freedom”
Time pressureVery lowLower on time pressure than 87% of occupations compared74% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a month or more but not every week”
Conflict situationsVery lowLower on conflict situations than 87% of occupations compared49% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a year or more but not every month”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleVery lowLower on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 89% of occupations compared84% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a year or more but not every month”
Consequence of errorLowLower on consequence of error than 69% of occupations compared40% of surveyed respondents chose “Fairly serious”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: very low
  • Conflict situations: very low
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: very low
  • Consequence of error: low

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0.26%
  • Occasional contact with others: 1.73%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 23.11%
  • Contact with others most of the time: suppressed by O*NET (low precision)
  • Constant contact with others: 18.33%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 0%
  • Fairly important: 25.91%
  • Important: 18.05%
  • Very important: 56.04%
  • Extremely important: 0%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 0.48%
  • Fairly important: 0%
  • Important: 13.75%
  • Very important: 23.93%
  • Extremely important: 61.84%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 1.24%
  • Limited freedom: 12.27%
  • Some freedom: 28.75%
  • A lot of freedom: 57.74%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 0%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 73.94%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 25.54%
  • Every day: 0.52%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Conflict situations

  • Never: 13.88%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 49.02%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 36.84%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 0.26%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 2.85%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 84.15%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 13%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 0%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 12.83%
  • Fairly serious: 40.07%
  • Serious: 23.76%
  • Very serious: 23.08%
  • Extremely serious: 0.26%

n = 18, Incumbent 07/2016

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Electronics Engineers, Except Computer

    Closeness 94/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Electrical Engineers

    Closeness 93/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -2

    Analyze
  • Materials Scientists

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Computer Systems Engineers/Architects

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -2

    Analyze
  • Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 17-2199.06 · SOC 17-2199 (detailed_parent, medium confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8