Non-Destructive Testing Specialists

Test the safety of structures, vehicles, or vessels using x-ray, ultrasound, fiber optic or related equipment.

Most important skills

  1. Reading Comprehension
  2. Quality Control Analysis
  3. Active Listening
  4. Critical Thinking
  5. Monitoring
  6. Writing
  7. Active Learning
  8. Operations Monitoring

Key knowledge

  1. Engineering and Technology
  2. Mathematics
  3. English Language
  4. Physics
  5. Education and Training
  6. Computers and Electronics
  7. Customer and Personal Service
  8. Production and Processing

What the work involves

  • Supervise or direct the work of non-destructive testing trainees or staff.
  • Produce images of objects on film, using radiographic techniques.
  • Develop or use new non-destructive testing methods, such as acoustic emission testing, leak testing, and thermal or infrared testing.
  • Document non-destructive testing methods, processes, or results.
  • Map the presence of imperfections within objects, using sonic measurements.
  • Make radiographic images to detect flaws in objects while leaving objects intact.
  • Visually examine materials, structures, or components for signs of corrosion, metal fatigue, cracks, or other flaws, using tools and equipment such as endoscopes, closed-circuit television systems, and fiber optics.
  • Interpret or evaluate test results in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, or procedures.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Realistic, Investigative, Conventional.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
High School Diploma or the equivalent (such as a GED) (68.2% of respondents)
Related experience
None (36.4%)
On-the-job training
Over 1 year, up to and including 2 years (40.9%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 2: Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Non-Destructive Testing Specialists is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
  • Projection education uses SOC 17-3029 (detailed_parent); it may describe a broader group.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersLowLower on contact with others than 78% of occupations compared50% of surveyed respondents chose “Contact with others most of the time”
Dealing with the publicHighHigher on dealing with the public than 71% of occupations compared55% of surveyed respondents chose “Very important”
TeamworkLowLower on teamwork than 78% of occupations compared43% of surveyed respondents chose “Very important”
Freedom to make decisionsModerateLower on freedom to make decisions than 54% of occupations compared41% of surveyed respondents chose “A lot of freedom”
Time pressureVery highHigher on time pressure than 83% of occupations compared59% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Conflict situationsModerateLower on conflict situations than 54% of occupations compared59% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a month or more but not every week”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleModerateLower on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 59% of occupations compared52% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a year or more but not every month”
Consequence of errorHighHigher on consequence of error than 78% of occupations compared38% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely serious”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: very high
  • Conflict situations: moderate
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: moderate
  • Consequence of error: high

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0%
  • Occasional contact with others: 9.09%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 13.64%
  • Contact with others most of the time: 50%
  • Constant contact with others: 27.27%

n = 22, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 0%
  • Fairly important: 4.55%
  • Important: 18.18%
  • Very important: 54.55%
  • Extremely important: 22.73%

n = 22, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 4.76%
  • Fairly important: 14.29%
  • Important: 4.76%
  • Very important: 42.86%
  • Extremely important: 33.33%

n = 21, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 9.09%
  • Limited freedom: 13.64%
  • Some freedom: 36.36%
  • A lot of freedom: 40.91%

n = 22, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 0%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 4.55%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 59.09%
  • Every day: 36.36%

n = 22, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Conflict situations

  • Never: 9.09%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 18.18%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 59.09%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 13.64%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 22, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 52.38%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 33.33%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 14.29%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 21, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 14.29%
  • Fairly serious: 9.52%
  • Serious: 9.52%
  • Very serious: 28.57%
  • Extremely serious: 38.1%

n = 21, Occupational Expert 08/2023

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant and System Operators

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Explosives Workers, Ordnance Handling Experts, and Blasters

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Surveyors

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone +2

    Analyze
  • Aviation Inspectors

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone +1

    Analyze
  • Forest and Conservation Technicians

    Closeness 91/100 · job zone +1

    Analyze
  • Precision Agriculture Technicians

    Closeness 91/100 · job zone +1

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 17-3029.01 · SOC 17-3029 (detailed_parent, medium confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8