Penetration Testers

Evaluate network system security by conducting simulated internal and external cyberattacks using adversary tools and techniques. Attempt to breach and exploit critical systems and gain access to sensitive information to assess system security.

Most important skills

  1. Critical Thinking
  2. Reading Comprehension
  3. Writing
  4. Active Listening
  5. Complex Problem Solving
  6. Programming
  7. Active Learning
  8. Systems Evaluation

Key knowledge

  1. Computers and Electronics
  2. Telecommunications
  3. Engineering and Technology
  4. English Language
  5. Customer and Personal Service
  6. Law and Government
  7. Education and Training
  8. Administration and Management

What the work involves

  • Assess the physical security of servers, systems, or network devices to identify vulnerability to temperature, vandalism, or natural disasters.
  • Collect stakeholder data to evaluate risk and to develop mitigation strategies.
  • Conduct network and security system audits, using established criteria.
  • Configure information systems to incorporate principles of least functionality and least access.
  • Design security solutions to address known device vulnerabilities.
  • Develop and execute tests that simulate the techniques of known cyber threat actors.
  • Develop infiltration tests that exploit device vulnerabilities.
  • Develop presentations on threat intelligence.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Investigative, Conventional, Realistic.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
Bachelor's Degree (40% of expert ratings)
Related experience
Over 2 years, up to and including 4 years (45%)
On-the-job training
Over 1 month, up to and including 3 months (35%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 4: Job Zone Four: Considerable Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Penetration Testers is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
  • Projection education uses SOC 15-1299 (detailed_parent); it may describe a broader group.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersLowLower on contact with others than 76% of occupations compared40% of surveyed respondents chose “Constant contact with others”
Dealing with the publicModerateHigher on dealing with the public than 53% of occupations compared30% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
TeamworkLowLower on teamwork than 63% of occupations compared42% of surveyed respondents chose “Very important”
Freedom to make decisionsModerateHigher on freedom to make decisions than 57% of occupations compared45% of surveyed respondents chose “A lot of freedom”
Time pressureHighHigher on time pressure than 73% of occupations compared65% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Conflict situationsModerateLower on conflict situations than 52% of occupations compared45% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a month or more but not every week”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleVery lowLower on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 82% of occupations compared58% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a year or more but not every month”
Consequence of errorVery highHigher on consequence of error than 81% of occupations compared37% of surveyed respondents chose “Very serious”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: high
  • Conflict situations: moderate
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: very low
  • Consequence of error: very high

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0%
  • Occasional contact with others: 10%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 20%
  • Contact with others most of the time: 30%
  • Constant contact with others: 40%

n = 20, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 10%
  • Fairly important: 15%
  • Important: 20%
  • Very important: 25%
  • Extremely important: 30%

n = 20, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 5.26%
  • Fairly important: 5.26%
  • Important: 5.26%
  • Very important: 42.11%
  • Extremely important: 42.11%

n = 19, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 0%
  • Limited freedom: 25%
  • Some freedom: 30%
  • A lot of freedom: 45%

n = 20, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 0%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 10%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 65%
  • Every day: 25%

n = 20, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Conflict situations

  • Never: 5%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 30%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 45%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 20%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 20, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 10.53%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 57.89%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 26.32%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 5.26%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 19, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 0%
  • Fairly serious: 15.79%
  • Serious: 21.05%
  • Very serious: 36.84%
  • Extremely serious: 26.32%

n = 19, Occupational Expert 08/2026

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Computer Hardware Engineers

    Closeness 91/100

    Analyze
  • Radio Frequency Identification Device Specialists

    Closeness 90/100

    Analyze
  • Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists

    Closeness 90/100

    Analyze
  • Remote Sensing Technicians

    Closeness 90/100

    Analyze
  • Intelligence Analysts

    Closeness 90/100

    Analyze
  • Medical Dosimetrists

    Closeness 90/100

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 15-1299.04 · SOC 15-1299 (detailed_parent, medium confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8