Radio Frequency Identification Device Specialists

Design and implement radio frequency identification device (RFID) systems used to track shipments or goods.

Most important skills

  1. Critical Thinking
  2. Active Listening
  3. Speaking
  4. Reading Comprehension
  5. Complex Problem Solving
  6. Judgment and Decision Making
  7. Writing
  8. Systems Analysis

Key knowledge

  1. Computers and Electronics
  2. Engineering and Technology
  3. English Language
  4. Design
  5. Customer and Personal Service
  6. Education and Training
  7. Mathematics
  8. Administration and Management

What the work involves

  • Verify compliance of developed applications with architectural standards and established practices.
  • Read current literature, attend meetings or conferences, or talk with colleagues to stay abreast of industry research about new technologies.
  • Provide technical support for radio frequency identification device (RFID) technology.
  • Perform systems analysis or programming of radio frequency identification device (RFID) technology.
  • Document equipment or process details of radio frequency identification device (RFID) technology.
  • Train users in details of system operation.
  • Analyze radio frequency identification device (RFID)-related supply chain data.
  • Test tags or labels to ensure readability.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Conventional, Realistic, Investigative.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
Bachelor's Degree (74.8% of respondents)
Related experience
Over 2 years, up to and including 4 years (25.6%)
On-the-job training
Over 6 months, up to and including 1 year (32.5%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 4: Job Zone Four: Considerable Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Radio Frequency Identification Device Specialists is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
  • Projection education uses SOC 17-2072 (detailed_parent); it may describe a broader group.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersModerateLower on contact with others than 54% of occupations compared54% of surveyed respondents chose “Constant contact with others”
Dealing with the publicHighHigher on dealing with the public than 62% of occupations compared41% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
TeamworkHighHigher on teamwork than 66% of occupations compared58% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
Freedom to make decisionsHighHigher on freedom to make decisions than 68% of occupations compared61% of surveyed respondents chose “Some freedom”
Time pressureHighHigher on time pressure than 60% of occupations compared56% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Conflict situationsHighHigher on conflict situations than 73% of occupations compared44% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleModerateLower on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 54% of occupations compared43% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a year or more but not every month”
Consequence of errorLowLower on consequence of error than 63% of occupations compared47% of surveyed respondents chose “Fairly serious”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: high
  • Conflict situations: high
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: moderate
  • Consequence of error: low

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0%
  • Occasional contact with others: 4.99%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 9.91%
  • Contact with others most of the time: 31.25%
  • Constant contact with others: 53.85%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 10.85%
  • Fairly important: 8.57%
  • Important: 19.53%
  • Very important: 20.5%
  • Extremely important: 40.55%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 1.36%
  • Fairly important: 0%
  • Important: 8.14%
  • Very important: 32.87%
  • Extremely important: 57.62%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 0%
  • Limited freedom: 2.73%
  • Some freedom: 61.23%
  • A lot of freedom: 36.04%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 5.42%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 14.63%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 55.67%
  • Every day: 24.29%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Conflict situations

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 25.39%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 30.21%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 44.4%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 4.99%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 42.57%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 30.84%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 21.6%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 7.21%
  • Fairly serious: 47.48%
  • Serious: 20.02%
  • Very serious: 16%
  • Extremely serious: 9.29%

n = 30, Incumbent 07/2015

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Computer Network Architects

    Closeness 94/100

    Analyze
  • Telecommunications Engineering Specialists

    Closeness 93/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Remote Sensing Technicians

    Closeness 93/100

    Analyze
  • Microsystems Engineers

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone +1

    Analyze
  • Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Mechatronics Engineers

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 17-2072.01 · SOC 17-2072 (detailed_parent, medium confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8