Remote Sensing Technicians

Apply remote sensing technologies to assist scientists in areas such as natural resources, urban planning, or homeland security. May prepare flight plans or sensor configurations for flight trips.

Most important skills

  1. Critical Thinking
  2. Reading Comprehension
  3. Speaking
  4. Mathematics
  5. Active Listening
  6. Monitoring
  7. Judgment and Decision Making
  8. Systems Analysis

Key knowledge

  1. Geography
  2. Computers and Electronics
  3. Mathematics
  4. Customer and Personal Service
  5. Engineering and Technology
  6. Production and Processing
  7. English Language
  8. Education and Training

What the work involves

  • Collaborate with agricultural workers to apply remote sensing information to efforts to reduce negative environmental impacts of farming practices.
  • Collect remote sensing data for forest or carbon tracking activities involved in assessing the impact of environmental change.
  • Provide remote sensing data for use in addressing environmental issues, such as surface water modeling or dust cloud detection.
  • Participate in the planning or development of mapping projects.
  • Verify integrity and accuracy of data contained in remote sensing image analysis systems.
  • Prepare documentation or presentations, including charts, photos, or graphs.
  • Merge scanned images or build photo mosaics of large areas, using image processing software.
  • Integrate remotely sensed data with other geospatial data.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Conventional, Realistic, Investigative.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
Bachelor's Degree (62% of respondents)
Related experience
Over 4 years, up to and including 6 years (23.5%)
On-the-job training
Over 3 months, up to and including 6 months (38%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 4: Job Zone Four: Considerable Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Remote Sensing Technicians is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
  • Projection education uses SOC 19-4099 (detailed_parent); it may describe a broader group.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersLowLower on contact with others than 73% of occupations compared—
Dealing with the publicVery lowLower on dealing with the public than 80% of occupations compared—
TeamworkLowLower on teamwork than 60% of occupations compared55% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
Freedom to make decisionsModerateLower on freedom to make decisions than 56% of occupations compared41% of surveyed respondents chose “A lot of freedom”
Time pressureModerateLower on time pressure than 51% of occupations compared37% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Conflict situationsModerateLower on conflict situations than 52% of occupations compared31% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleVery lowLower on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 84% of occupations compared38% of surveyed respondents chose “Never”
Consequence of errorVery lowLower on consequence of error than 85% of occupations compared34% of surveyed respondents chose “Not serious at all”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: moderate
  • Conflict situations: moderate
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: very low
  • Consequence of error: very low

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0%
  • Occasional contact with others: 4.53%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 26.74%
  • Contact with others most of the time: 28.91%
  • Constant contact with others: suppressed by O*NET (low precision)

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 29.95%
  • Fairly important: 11.26%
  • Important: suppressed by O*NET (low precision)
  • Very important: 4.43%
  • Extremely important: 11.5%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 0%
  • Fairly important: 4.16%
  • Important: 32.89%
  • Very important: 7.57%
  • Extremely important: 55.38%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 0%
  • Limited freedom: 33.9%
  • Some freedom: 24.97%
  • A lot of freedom: 41.13%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 3.94%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 33.56%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 36.52%
  • Every day: suppressed by O*NET (low precision)

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Conflict situations

  • Never: 19.01%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 22.36%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 22.95%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 31.43%
  • Every day: 4.25%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 37.62%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 22.07%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 25.15%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 10.91%
  • Every day: 4.25%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 33.76%
  • Fairly serious: 29.35%
  • Serious: 22.11%
  • Very serious: 10.53%
  • Extremely serious: 4.25%

n = 19, Incumbent 07/2012

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians

    Closeness 93/100

    Analyze
  • Radio Frequency Identification Device Specialists

    Closeness 93/100

    Analyze
  • Cartographers and Photogrammetrists

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Surveying and Mapping Technicians

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Information Security Analysts

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Geodetic Surveyors

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 19-4099.03 · SOC 19-4099 (detailed_parent, medium confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8