Urban and Regional Planners

Develop comprehensive plans and programs for use of land and physical facilities of jurisdictions, such as towns, cities, counties, and metropolitan areas.

Most important skills

  1. Active Listening
  2. Speaking
  3. Judgment and Decision Making
  4. Reading Comprehension
  5. Critical Thinking
  6. Systems Analysis
  7. Writing
  8. Complex Problem Solving

Key knowledge

  1. Law and Government
  2. English Language
  3. Geography
  4. Transportation
  5. Communications and Media
  6. Administration and Management
  7. Sociology and Anthropology
  8. Customer and Personal Service

What the work involves

  • Conduct interviews, surveys and site inspections concerning factors that affect land usage, such as zoning, traffic flow and housing.
  • Prepare reports, using statistics, charts, and graphs, to illustrate planning studies in areas such as population, land use, or zoning.
  • Prepare, develop and maintain maps and databases.
  • Prepare, maintain and update files and records, including land use data and statistics.
  • Research, compile, analyze and organize information from maps, reports, investigations, and books for use in reports and special projects.
  • Respond to public inquiries and complaints.
  • Design, promote, or administer government plans or policies affecting land use, zoning, public utilities, community facilities, housing, or transportation.
  • Recommend approval, denial, or conditional approval of proposals.

Strongest interest areas (O*NET): Investigative, Enterprising, Conventional.

Qualifications and licensing

Most common education
Master's Degree (56% of respondents)
Related experience
Over 1 year, up to and including 2 years (40%)
On-the-job training
None or short demonstration (24%)
Preparation level
O*NET job zone 5: Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Licensing
Not yet verified. Check your state licensing board.
Check before planning
  • Licensing for Urban and Regional Planners is not yet verified for any state: check the state licensing board before planning.
Limits
  • Distributions show what current workers or occupational experts report, not legal minimums.
  • Requirements vary by employer and state; time to qualify is not estimated.

Source: O*NET 31.0 Database (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); BLS Employment Projections · dataset 2026.10.8 · method e3-qualification-1.0.0

Work environment

How the typical conditions of this occupation compare with 911 occupations in O*NET (very low = the lowest fifth).

Levels are relative. Most occupations involve a lot of contact with people, for example, so “very low” can still mean regular contact; the last column shows what workers actually reported.

Rankings compare typical U.S. occupation-level work conditions; individual jobs and employers vary. Data: O*NET 31.0 Work Context and BLS wages (May 2025).
ConditionLevelCompared with other occupationsMost common answer (O*NET survey)
Contact with othersLowLower on contact with others than 73% of occupations compared48% of surveyed respondents chose “Contact with others most of the time”
Dealing with the publicVery highHigher on dealing with the public than 83% of occupations compared44% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
TeamworkHighHigher on teamwork than 64% of occupations compared60% of surveyed respondents chose “Extremely important”
Freedom to make decisionsLowLower on freedom to make decisions than 76% of occupations compared58% of surveyed respondents chose “Some freedom”
Time pressureLowLower on time pressure than 74% of occupations compared48% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a week or more but not every day”
Conflict situationsHighHigher on conflict situations than 72% of occupations compared54% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a month or more but not every week”
Dealing with unpleasant or angry peopleHighHigher on dealing with unpleasant or angry people than 63% of occupations compared48% of surveyed respondents chose “Once a month or more but not every week”
Consequence of errorVery lowLower on consequence of error than 94% of occupations compared50% of surveyed respondents chose “Fairly serious”

Work-pressure profile

  • Time pressure: low
  • Conflict situations: high
  • Dealing with unpleasant or angry people: high
  • Consequence of error: very low

Each part is shown on its own. There is no combined stress score, and conditions vary by employer and role.

Full answer distributions

Contact with others

  • No contact with others: 0%
  • Occasional contact with others: 0%
  • Contact with others about half the time: 24%
  • Contact with others most of the time: 48%
  • Constant contact with others: 28%

n = 25, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Dealing with the public

  • Not important at all: 0%
  • Fairly important: 0%
  • Important: 16%
  • Very important: 40%
  • Extremely important: 44%

n = 25, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Teamwork

  • Not important at all: 0%
  • Fairly important: 4%
  • Important: 8%
  • Very important: 28%
  • Extremely important: 60%

n = 25, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Freedom to make decisions

  • No freedom: 0%
  • Very little freedom: 4.17%
  • Limited freedom: 25%
  • Some freedom: 58.33%
  • A lot of freedom: 12.5%

n = 24, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Time pressure

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 4%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 44%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 48%
  • Every day: 4%

n = 25, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Conflict situations

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 16.67%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 54.17%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 25%
  • Every day: 4.17%

n = 24, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Dealing with unpleasant or angry people

  • Never: 0%
  • Once a year or more but not every month: 26.09%
  • Once a month or more but not every week: 47.83%
  • Once a week or more but not every day: 26.09%
  • Every day: 0%

n = 23, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Consequence of error

  • Not serious at all: 33.33%
  • Fairly serious: 50%
  • Serious: 8.33%
  • Very serious: 8.33%
  • Extremely serious: 0%

n = 24, Occupational Expert 08/2021

Is this career right for me? Find jobs with conditions you prefer

Where people with this background could move

  • Chief Sustainability Officers

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Management Analysts

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Sustainability Specialists

    Closeness 92/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze
  • Climate Change Policy Analysts

    Closeness 92/100

    Analyze
  • Environmental Restoration Planners

    Closeness 91/100

    Analyze
  • Brownfield Redevelopment Specialists and Site Managers

    Closeness 91/100 · job zone -1

    Analyze

Find more alternativesCompare skills with another job

O*NET-SOC 19-3051.00 · SOC 19-3051 (exact, high confidence) · dataset 2026.10.8